Home Technology Investors with 30% stake in a startup lack long-term vision.

Investors with 30% stake in a startup lack long-term vision.

Investors with 30% stake in a startup lack long-term vision.

The news article discusses the issue of early-stage investors taking a large percentage of equity from startups in funding rounds. The author highlights conversations with investors who are proud of being able to secure 25-30% or even 41% stakes in startups. This trend was observed by the author during their visit to Oslo, where they engaged with various players in the startup ecosystem.

The author emphasizes that investors who aim for high ownership stakes are being shortsighted and detrimental to the startup’s success. Founding a startup is already a challenging endeavor, and investors should offer support rather than disincentivizing and demoralizing the founders. By taking too much ownership early on, investors hinder the potential for the founders to be appropriately compensated in case of an exit.

To illustrate the negative consequences of excessive dilution, the author explains the impact of a company diluting by 30% in each funding round. This situation creates a “poison pill,” as future investors will be hesitant to fund a startup that has little ownership left for the founders. Ultimately, the article argues against investors taking too much equity in early rounds and emphasizes the importance of sustainable and fair investment practices for the long-term success of startups.

In conclusion, the article highlights the harmful effects of investors demanding a high percentage of equity in early-stage startups. It criticizes such practices as shortsighted and damaging to the startup ecosystem. The author advocates for investors to support founders rather than hinder their chances of success. By taking too much ownership, investors diminish the potential returns and disincentivize founders. The article warns that excessive dilution causes future investors to be wary, making it challenging for startups to secure further funding. Overall, the article calls for a more balanced and sustainable approach to investment in early-stage startups.

Source link